首页 >  大连海洋大学学报 >  不同植物组合的生态浮床对浅水富营养化湖泊水质净化效果及浮游动物群落结构的影响

2023, 38(2): 302-310. doi: 10.16535/j.cnki.dlhyxb.2022-217

不同植物组合的生态浮床对浅水富营养化湖泊水质净化效果及浮游动物群落结构的影响

1. 上海海洋大学 水产与生命学院, 上海 201306;

2. 中国水产科学研究院淡水渔业研究中心 农业农村部淡水渔业和种质资源利用重点实验室, 江苏 无锡 214081;

3. 南京农业大学 无锡渔业学院, 江苏 无锡 214081

收稿日期:2022-07-11

基金项目:   国家重点研发计划"蓝色粮仓科技创新"重点专项(2019YFD0901203) 

关键词: 生态浮床 , 原位修复 , 富营养化湖泊 , 浮游动物 , 冗余分析

Effects of different ecological floating bed plant assemblages on water purification and zooplankton community structure in shallow eutrophic lakes

1. College of Fisheries and Life Science, Shanghai Ocean University, Shanghai 201306, China;

2. Key Laboratory of Freshwater Fisheries and Germplasm Resources Utilization, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Freshwater Fisheries Research Center, Chinese Academy of Fishery Sciences, Wuxi 214081, China;

3. College of Wuxi Fisheries, Nanjing Agriculture University, Wuxi 214081, China

Received Date:2022-07-11

Keywords: ecological floating bed , restoration in situ , shallow eutrophic lake , zooplankton , redundancy analysis

摘要

为探究不同植物组合的生态浮床对浅水富营养化湖泊的水质净化效果及浮游动物群落结构的影响,于2021年6月对太湖梅梁湾示范区内已实施围网和围隔设施下的不同植物组合 [美人蕉(Canna indica)+菖蒲(Acorus calamus)+芦苇(Phragmites australis)和美人蕉(Canna indica)+水芹(Oenanthe javanica)+慈姑(Sagittaria sagittifolia)] 的生态浮床中浮游动物群落结构进行了调查。 结果表明:生态浮床对浅水富营养化湖泊水质的净化效果良好,围网及围隔修复区较对照区总氮(TN)、总磷(TP) 、叶绿素a(Chl-a)和高锰酸盐指数(CODMn)等水体营养盐指标均显著降低(P<0.05),水体透明度显著上升(P<0.05);围网及围隔修复区域浮游动物种类数由对照区域的23种增加到39种,且由单一耐污种转变为多种类共存,其中,围网修复区内植物组合1(美人蕉+菖蒲+芦苇) 的生态浮床浮游动物生物量及丰度显著高于对照区(P<0.05),表明修复区比对照区具有更强的浮游动物多样性恢复能力;冗余分析显示,Tur、Chl-a、CODMn和pH是影响浮游动物群落变化的主要环境因子;不同植物组合的生态浮床均在净化水质的同时提高了浮游动物密度和生物量。研究表明,浅水富营养化湖泊中置入两组不同植物组合的生态浮床,均可改变浮游动物群落结构,进而改善水环境原位修复效果,尤其以围网设施下美人蕉+菖蒲+芦苇的植物组合修复效果最好,本研究结果可为浅水富营养化湖泊水环境保护和水生生物资源恢复提供科学依据。

为探究不同植物组合的生态浮床对浅水富营养化湖泊的水质净化效果及浮游动物群落结构的影响,于2021年6月对太湖梅梁湾示范区内已实施围网和围隔设施下的不同植物组合 [美人蕉(Canna indica)+菖蒲(Acorus calamus)+芦苇(Phragmites australis)和美人蕉(Canna indica)+水芹(Oenanthe javanica)+慈姑(Sagittaria sagittifolia)] 的生态浮床中浮游动物群落结构进行了调查。 结果表明:生态浮床对浅水富营养化湖泊水质的净化效果良好,围网及围隔修复区较对照区总氮(TN)、总磷(TP) 、叶绿素a(Chl-a)和高锰酸盐指数(CODMn)等水体营养盐指标均显著降低(P<0.05),水体透明度显著上升(P<0.05);围网及围隔修复区域浮游动物种类数由对照区域的23种增加到39种,且由单一耐污种转变为多种类共存,其中,围网修复区内植物组合1(美人蕉+菖蒲+芦苇) 的生态浮床浮游动物生物量及丰度显著高于对照区(P<0.05),表明修复区比对照区具有更强的浮游动物多样性恢复能力;冗余分析显示,Tur、Chl-a、CODMn和pH是影响浮游动物群落变化的主要环境因子;不同植物组合的生态浮床均在净化水质的同时提高了浮游动物密度和生物量。研究表明,浅水富营养化湖泊中置入两组不同植物组合的生态浮床,均可改变浮游动物群落结构,进而改善水环境原位修复效果,尤其以围网设施下美人蕉+菖蒲+芦苇的植物组合修复效果最好,本研究结果可为浅水富营养化湖泊水环境保护和水生生物资源恢复提供科学依据。

参考文献

[1] EOM H,BORGATTI D R,PAERL H,et al.Formation of low-molecular-weight dissolved organic nitrogen in predenitrification biological nutrient removal systems and its impact on eutrophication in coastal waters[J].Environmental Science & Technology,2017,51(7):3776/3783.
[2] GAGNON V,CHAZARENC F,KÕIV M,et al.Effect of plant species on water quality at the outlet of a sludge treatment wetland[J].Water Research,2012,46(16):5305-5315.
[3] ZIMMELS Y,KIRZHNER F,MALKOVSKAJA A.Application and features of cascade aquatic plants system for sewage treatment[J].Ecological Engineering,2008,34(2):147-161.
[4] ALLAM A,TAWFIK A,EL-SAADI A,et al.Potentials of using duckweed (Lemna gibba) for treatment of drainage water for reuse in irrigation purposes[J].Desalination and Water Treatment,2016,57(1):459-467.
[5] KALIN M,WHEELER W N,MEINRATH G.The removal of uranium from mining waste water using algal/microbial biomass[J].Journal of Environmental Radioactivity,2005,78(2):151-177.
[6] TIMMS R M,MOSS B.Prevention of growth of potentially dense phytoplankton populations by zooplankton grazing,in the presence of zooplanktivorous fish,in a shallow wetland ecosystem[J].Limnology and Oceanography,1984,29(3):472-486.
[7] MEERHOFF M,FOSALBA C,BRUZZONE C,et al.An experimental study of habitat choice by Daphnia:plants signal danger more than refuge in subtropical lakes[J].Freshwater Biology,2006,51(7):1320-1330.
[8] TASEVSKA O,JERSABEK C D,KOSTOSKI G,et al.Differences in rotifer communities in two freshwater bodies of different trophic degree (Lake Ohrid and Lake Dojran,Macedonia)[J].Biologia,2012,67(3):565-572.
[9] 孙从军,高阳俊,曹勇,等.淀山湖河口生态浮床试验工程设计与效果研究[J].中国给水排水,2010,26(18):64-68. SUN C J,GAO Y J,CAO Y,et al.Study on design and effect of estuary ecological floating bed pilot project at Dianshan Lake[J].China Water & Wastewater,2010,26(18):64-68.(in Chinese)
[10] 李文芬,刘沛芬,颜亨梅,等.5种浮床植物在水环境恢复治理中的净化差异[J].北京师范大学学报(自然科学版),2012,48(2):173-176. LI W F,LIU P F,YAN H M,et al.A comparison of the purification capacity of five plant types cultivated on floating-bed for restoration of aquatic environment[J].Journal of Beijing Normal University (Natural Science Edition),2012,48(2):173-176.(in Chinese)
[11] 赵文.水生生物学[M].北京:中国农业出版社,2005. ZHAO W.Aquatic biology[M].Beijing:China Agriculture Press,2005.(in Chinese)
[12] 梁秋象,方纪祖,杨和荃.水生生物学:形态和分类[M].北京:中国农业出版社,2003. LIANG Q X,FANG J Z,YANG H Q.Hydrobiology:morphology and classification[M].Beijing:China Agriculture Press,2003.(in Chinese)
[13] 王家楫.中国淡水轮虫志[M].北京:科学出版社,1961. WANG J J.Freshwater rotifers in China[M].Beijing:Science Press,1961.(in Chinese)
[14] 周凤霞,陈剑虹.淡水微型生物图谱[M].北京:化学工业出版社,2005. ZHOU F X,CHEN J H.Microbiological atlases of freshwater[M].Beijing:Chemical Industry Press,2005.(in Chinese)
[15] 杜明勇,于洋,阳振,等.太湖流域2012年枯水期浮游生物群落结构特征[J].湖泊科学,2014,26(5):724-734. DU M Y,YU Y,YANG Z,et al.Characteristics of community structure of plankton in the Lake Taihu Basin during the dry season of 2012[J].Journal of Lake Sciences,2014,26(5):724-734.(in Chinese)
[16] 郭岩岩,牛新胜,王兰明,等.混合植物型生态浮岛对乡村河道水体的净化效果[J].中国农学通报,2019,35(15):49-53. GUO Y Y,NIU X S,WANG L M,et al.Purifying effect of mixed plant-type ecological floating island on rural rivers[J].Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin,2019,35(15):49-53.(in Chinese)
[17] 蒋跃,童琰,由文辉,等.3种浮床植物生长特性及氮、磷吸收的优化配置研究[J].中国环境科学,2011,31(5):774-780. JIANG Y,TONG Y,YOU W H,et al.Comparison of the growth characteristics and the optimize configuration modes of the nitrogen and phosphorus uptake capacity of three kinds of plant cultivated on the floating-bed[J].China Environmental Science,2011,31(5):774-780.(in Chinese)
[18] 苏媛,高照良,娄永才,等.3种浮床植物对关中地区2种污染源涝池水体净化效率研究[J].水土保持学报,2020,34(4):347-353,363. SU Y,GAO Z L,LOU Y C,et al.Study on the purification effects of three floating-bed plants for water bodies of two pollution sources in water storage pond of Guanzhong area[J].Journal of Soil and Water Conservation,2020,34(4):347-353,363.(in Chinese)
[19] 杨佳,周健,秦伯强,等.太湖梅梁湾浮游动物群落结构长期变化特征(1997-2017年)[J].环境科学,2020,41(3):1246-1255. YANG J,ZHOU J,QIN B Q,et al.Long-term variation characteristics of zooplankton community structure in Meiliang Bay,lake Taihu(1997-2017)[J].Environmental Science,2020,41(3):1246-1255.(in Chinese)
[20] SLÁDEǑEK V.Rotifers as indicators of water quality[J].Hydrobiologia,1983,100(1):169-201.
[21] 吴秋婷,卫志宏,朱江,等.一座季节性休渔湖泊:洱海轮虫的季节动态特征[J].湖泊科学,2012,24(4):586-592. WU Q T,WEI Z H,ZHU J,et al.Seasonal dynamics of rotifer in a seasonal fishing moratorium lake-Lake Erhai,Yunnan Province,China[J].Journal of Lake Sciences,2012,24(4):586-592.(in Chinese)
[22] 梁培瑜,王烜,马芳冰.水动力条件对水体富营养化的影响[J].湖泊科学,2013,25(4):455-462. LIANG P Y,WANG X,MA F B.Effect of hydrodynamic conditions on water eutrophication:a review[J].Journal of Lake Sciences,2013,25(4):455-462.(in Chinese)
[23] 陈佳琪,赵坤,曹玥,等.鄱阳湖浮游动物群落结构及其与环境因子的关系[J].生态学报,2020,40(18):6644-6658. CHEN J Q,ZHAO K,CAO Y,et al.Zooplankton community structure and its relationship with environmental factors in Poyang Lake[J].Acta Ecologica Sinica,2020,40(18):6644-6658.(in Chinese)
[24] 付菲雨,韩霈武,方舟,等.西北太平洋春、冬季浮游动物优势种水平分布与影响因子的关系[J].大连海洋大学学报,2022,37(3):489-496. FU F Y,HAN P W,FANG Z,et al.Distribution and relationship with influential factors of dominant zooplankton species in the Northwest Pacific Ocean in spring and winter[J].Journal of Dalian Ocean University,2022,37(3):489-496.(in Chinese)
[25] 吴利,冯伟松,张堂林,等.湖北省西凉湖浮游动物群落周年动态变化及其与环境因子的关系[J].湖泊科学,2011,23(4):619-625. WU L,FENG W S,ZHANG T L,et al.The annual fluctuation of zooplankton community and its relation with environmental factors in Lake Xiliang,Hubei Province[J].Journal of Lake Sciences,2011,23(4):619-625.(in Chinese)
[26] 黄祥飞,胡春英,伍焯田.武汉东湖的轮虫[J].水生生物学报,1985,9(2):129-143. HUANG X F,HU C Y,WU Z T.Rotifers in lake Donghu,Wuhan[J].Acta Hydrobiologica Sinica,1985,9(2):129-143.(in Chinese)
[27] KAMBOJ V,KAMBOJ N.Spatial and temporal variation of zooplankton assemblage in the mining-impacted stretch of Ganga River,Uttarakhand,India[J].Environmental Science and Pollution Research,2020,27(21):27135-27146.
[28] 林青,由文辉,徐凤洁,等.滴水湖浮游动物群落结构及其与环境因子的关系[J].生态学报,2014,34(23):6918-6929. LIN Q,YOU W H,XU F J,et al.Zooplankton community structure and its relationship with environmental factors in Dishui Lake[J].Acta Ecologica Sinica,2014,34(23):6918-6929.(in Chinese)
[29] VAN EGEREN S J,DODSON S I,TORKE B,et al.The relative significance of environmental and anthropogenic factors affecting zooplankton community structure in Southeast Wisconsin Till Plain Lakes[J].Hydrobiologia,2011,668(1):137-146.

相关文章

[1] 陈晶, 聂青, 刘妍. 《WHO基本药物示范目录》与我国《国家基本药物目录》动态调整程序比较与借鉴.水产学报,2015(3): 289-293.doi:10.3866/PKU.WHXB201503022
  • 导出引用
  • 下载XML
  • 收藏文章
计量
  • 文章下载量()
  • 文章访问量()

目录

不同植物组合的生态浮床对浅水富营养化湖泊水质净化效果及浮游动物群落结构的影响